← Back to Projects

M.S. THESIS • MICROFABRICATION • ENERGY STORAGE

New Generation of High-Power Density 3D Interdigitated Supercapacitors

Design, fabrication, electrochemical characterization, and finite-element modeling of glassy-carbon microsupercapacitors for miniaturized biomedical systems.

Institution San Diego State University
Degree M.S. Bioengineering
Completed 2026
Focus MEMS & Energy Storage

Compact energy storage for microscale biomedical devices.

Miniaturized biomedical and MEMS devices require energy-storage systems that can deliver high power while operating within extremely limited physical space.

This research investigated glassy-carbon interdigitated micro-supercapacitors as a potential solution.

Galileo fabricated interdigitated microsupercapacitor

Galileo fabricated microsupercapacitor

Marco Polo fabricated interdigitated microsupercapacitor

Marco Polo fabricated microsupercapacitor

How does electrode geometry and thickness affect microsupercapacitor performance?

Three-dimensional glassy-carbon electrodes were fabricated at approximate thicknesses of 3 µm, 5 µm, and 9 µm.

Two interdigitated electrode architectures, Galileo and Marco Polo, were evaluated to study the effects of electrode thickness and active surface area on electrochemical performance.

Galileo & Marco Polo

Two interdigitated electrode geometries were developed and fabricated. The larger Marco Polo architecture provided greater electrochemically active area, while Galileo offered a more compact electrode configuration.

Galileo

Compact interdigitated electrode architecture used to study the influence of electrode thickness on microscale charge storage.

Galileo interdigitated electrode CAD design

Galileo electrode geometry

Marco Polo

Larger interdigitated electrode geometry designed to increase active electrode surface area and improve charge-storage performance.

Marco Polo interdigitated electrode CAD design

Marco Polo electrode geometry

From photoresist to glassy carbon.

The devices were produced using a multi-step MEMS fabrication process incorporating photolithography, pyrolysis, polymer insulation, thin-film metal deposition, and sacrificial-layer processing.

01

Photolithography

SQ-25 photoresist was patterned into interdigitated electrode structures.

02

Pyrolysis

The patterned photoresist was converted into conductive glassy-carbon electrodes.

03

Insulation

Polyimide layers were deposited and annealed to electrically isolate device regions.

04

Current Collectors

Platinum current collectors were deposited to provide electrical connection to the carbon electrodes.

05

Encapsulation

A second polyimide layer was applied to encapsulate and protect the metal traces.

06

Release

Sacrificial-layer processing and BHF release produced the final devices.

Microsupercapacitor fabrication process

Microsupercapacitor fabrication process

Microsupercapacitor Galileo on Wafer

All four Layers of The Galileo Microsupercapacitor on Wafer

Microsupercapacitor Marco-Polo on Wafer

All four Layers of The Marco-Polo Microsupercapacitor on Wafer

Characterizing real device performance.

Devices were characterized using phosphate-buffered saline to evaluate capacitive performance under physiologically relevant conditions and ferrocyanide electrolyte to investigate redox-enhanced charge storage.

Cyclic Voltammetry

Evaluated charge storage, capacitance, and reversible electrochemical behavior.

Galileo cyclic voltammetry response in ferrocyanide electrolyte

Galileo — cyclic voltammetry in ferrocyanide

Marco Polo cyclic voltammetry response in ferrocyanide electrolyte

Marco Polo — cyclic voltammetry in ferrocyanide

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Characterized impedance, electron transport, and frequency-dependent capacitive behavior.

Galileo EIS response

Galileo — EIS in PBS

Marco Polo EIS response

Marco Polo — EIS in PBS

Galvanostatic Charge-Discharge

Examined charge-discharge behavior and energy-storage performance.

The 5 µm devices delivered the strongest overall performance.

5 µm

Optimal electrode thickness in this study

25.55 µW

Highest measured power output for the 5 µm Marco Polo device in ferrocyanide

191.45 µJ

Energy storage for the 5 µm Marco Polo device in ferrocyanide

Increasing electrode thickness from 3 µm to 5 µm consistently improved charge storage, capacitance, energy storage, and power output.

The larger Marco Polo electrode architecture produced substantially greater charge storage, energy storage, and power output than Galileo because of its larger active electrode area.

The 9 µm devices did not continue the expected improvement trend because fabrication defects, including electrode delamination and exposed metal current collectors, introduced parasitic electrochemical behavior and partial shorting.

COMSOL electrostatic modeling.

A three-dimensional COMSOL model was developed to evaluate electric potential, electric-field magnitude, and stored electrostatic energy throughout the interdigitated Galileo geometry.

Both analytical calculations and finite-element modeling predicted increasing stored electrostatic energy as electrode thickness increased, supporting the relationship between three-dimensional electrode geometry and device performance.

Engineering takeaway

Electrode thickness and active electrode area both strongly influence microsupercapacitor performance. Within the devices successfully fabricated in this study, 5 µm glassy-carbon electrodes provided the best balance between electrochemical performance and fabrication reliability.

Future development should focus on improving fabrication reliability for thicker electrodes, particularly sacrificial-layer lift-off, current-collector deposition, and polyimide insulation.

MEMS Photolithography Spin Coating Pyrolysis Glassy Carbon Thin-Film Deposition Polyimide Processing Electrochemistry Cyclic Voltammetry EIS GCD COMSOL Python Data Analysis

Next Project

View More Engineering Work →